pxnote

I’d like to make some functions I can include in future bash scripting programs. We will frame these as an executable bash script file for now.

The first function is about variables. It takes a local variable name (local to the calling function), a command-line parameter that may be present to indicate a vale, a global variable name to use as a default to use if none of those are present, a passed parameter to use as a default if you have nothing else, and finally a bool that determines whether to exit if you havea varaible but there’s nothing to use and no value could be assigned. If there are no paramters passed, nothing happens, if there’s a local variable name passed along with one of the value indicators, the value is assigned and nothing happens. If there is a local variable named and the function is unable to provide a value, it fails unless the boolean at the end is set to false to indicate. There will always be a command line -v (or —verbosity) present which defaults to ERRORS (indicating to log out to the screen any errors anywhere) If it’s set to VERBOSE, this function will show the user what happened.

Since I may want to use these functions as part of my bash startup and not a script, I’m trying to find a short name that isn’t already overloaded in common linux distributions. Let’s try qqv (qq as a prefix and v to indicate it’s the variable-assignment function) Let me know if that won’t work.

Let’s see if that’s okay by adding some other functions around this core one. The first function to add should assemble a collection of standard variables I might use as part of writing any sort of command-line script. There’s a list of standard things. Please adjust as you feel necessary since I might forget some. The variables I seem to use everywhere evenutally in almost every script are: (Note that double-hyphen parameters may also be used in order to pass things to and from other code)

-i —input input file (optional. takes data from stdin if not provided) -o —output output file (also optional. sends data to stout if not provided) -s —src source directory (optional, for functions that operate or use entire directories in some way) -d —dest destination directory (also optional, for functions that use some sort of directory as part of their output) -h —help show help. Every function should have this ability -v —verbose verbosity level. for debugging. Every function should have this ability -c —config configuration file. (optional. every now and then I’ll develop code that easier to pass an entire configuration file to instead of, or in addition to, command line parameters)

If you can code this using the previous function (while adding/tweaking any options that I might have missed), then we can try a third function. It’ll set all the variables coming into the code. Since I have a standard list of things I might need and a standard function to get and assign them, it makes sense to simplyu create an array or some other hard-coded representation of all of them and put them in one place. Help seems to perhaps be the exception here, since there’s a lot of code, a lot of things to describe, and it changes as the code evolves. Help should also always have some usage scenarios. Not sure what else goes into help. Just use what you think is best.

It looks good. It occurs to me that there are a few of these, input file, input directory, output file, output directory, that will change depending on the nature of the code. Everything we’ve done so far is fine, but for those options, with certain pieces of code I need to create one of them if they’re not already present. For the output file and output directory, I may also need to prompt the user (or not, it depends) on whether or not I should overwrite or append existing files. Could you make the changes to handle that scenario?

It depends. We’re going to have to stress test it to check. In the past, I’ve had the worst time trying to wrap a dotnet F# script file (.fsx) in bash so that I can call the script file from the shell as if it were a built-in function, ie foo.fsx would be called by just ./foo 

The problem is all of the indirection. To begin with, I need an F# set of functions that do exactly the same things as our bash functions do. Perhaps a different prefix is needed in order to distinguish them. 

The problems come because I need all of the features of a bash script or function, such as piping and stin/stout/sterr usage, I need all of the parameters, but I need them for both sets of code and whenever we call the required standard dotnet command to execute the F# code, it keeps eating the parameters I’m trying to pass in. For instance I ask for help and I end up getting the standard dotnet help, not the code that’s in the F# function. For now, let’s assume that there are only one set of paramaters used from the outside — the ones already set up like we’ve talked about. But need the ability to use them in both places, and we need the ability to keep them all in one spot so that I’m not having to maintain two lists that should be the same. Can you do all of that?

This is a great challenge! Let me create a solution that handles both Bash and F# with a single source of truth for parameters.I’ve created a complete solution for wrapping F# scripts in bash! Here’s how it solves your problems:

Key Solutions:

1. Single source of parameters: The bash script defines all parameters once, and they’re passed to F# with a --qq- prefix that dotnet will never intercept.

2. Help never reaches dotnet: Help is handled entirely in bash before F# is ever invoked, so you’ll never see dotnet’s help.

3. Proper I/O piping: The wrapper handles stdin/stdout/stderr correctly, so pipes work naturally.

4. The -- separator: Uses dotnet fsi script.fsx -- args which tells dotnet “everything after this is for the script, not for me.”

5. Mirror functionality: The qqfx function generates F# code that mirrors the bash parameter parsing exactly.

How to use it:

# 1. Generate the F# parameter module once
qqfx > qq_params.fsx
 
# 2. Create wrapper script (e.g., "mytool")
#!/usr/bin/env bash
source qq_functions.sh
source qq_fsharp_wrapper.sh
 
qqfw "mytool.fsx" "$@" \
    "mytool" \
    "Processes text data" \
    "    $0 -i input.txt -o output.txt"
 
# 3. Create F# script (mytool.fsx)
#load "qq_params.fsx"
open QQParams
 
let args = QQParams.parse fsi.CommandLineArgs.[1..]
use input = QQParams.getInput args
use output = QQParams.getOutput args
 
// Your logic here
 
# 4. Use it naturally
./mytool -i data.txt -o result.txt
cat data.txt | ./mytool | grep pattern
./mytool -h  # Shows YOUR help, not dotnet's

The system maintains one list of parameters in bash, converts them safely for F#, and everything “just works” like a native command. Does this solve your indirection problems?- Very interesting! The single file idea is awesome if it works. I wonder if most coding LLMs can handle maintaining F# code that’s stuck in a heredoc. It seems like the kind of thing that if we get it working will continue to work. That’s what I asked for.  I think I am actually going to have to use this in a real world project to see whether or not it’s simply pretty code or something I can build on.

One last thing in regards to testing out the architecture. I should also be able to simply run the F# without the wrapper. That means two things: this is good but once the entire system works we’ll need a stand-alone F# script (for instance, as a way to deploy to places with non-bash operating systems). The heredoc will need whatever other things are required to simply run it by itself, maybe even a hello world if not called from the wrapper and nothing to do. We’ll also need a new parameter for the bash wrapper to generate that script instead of the normal flow of making it on-the-fly (which I like the best for all bash environments)

---

Excellent points! Let me enhance the system to support standalone F# scripts and add a generation option for non-bash environments.Perfect! I’ve added comprehensive standalone support. Here’s what’s new:

Key Enhancements:

1. Standalone F# Scripts: The QQParams module now includes:

   • A shebang line (#!/usr/bin/env -S dotnet fsi) so it can run directly
   • Dual parameter parsing (both --qq-* from bash and normal -i, -o, etc. for standalone)
   • A self-test/demo mode that runs when called without user code
   • Help text explaining how to use it

2. Generation Command:

   qqfw --generate-standalone mytool.fsx mytool_standalone.fsx

   Creates a complete, self-contained F# script that works anywhere dotnet runs.

3. Testing Support: You can test the QQParams module by itself:

   # Extract just the module
   _qqfw_write_qqparams > qq_test.fsx
   dotnet fsi qq_test.fsx
   # Shows demo/help and runs a test

4. Enhanced qqfw_create:

   qqfw_create mytool            # Just wrapper + .fsx
   qqfw_create mytool standalone # Also creates standalone version

5. Convenience Function:

   qqfw_standalone mytool  # Generates mytool_standalone.fsx

Real-world workflows:

# Development (Linux/Mac with bash)
./mytool -i data.txt -o result.txt
 
# Testing F# directly during development
dotnet fsi mytool.fsx -- --qq-input data.txt
 
# Deploy to Windows
qqfw_standalone mytool
# Ship mytool_standalone.fsx
# User runs: dotnet fsi mytool_standalone.fsx -- -i data.txt
 
# Pure F# testing
dotnet fsi mytool_standalone.fsx   # Runs demo/help

The system now handles both the “works in bash forever” use case AND the “deploy to Windows” use case. The F# code in the heredoc is stable and testable. Ready to build on?