DB Markham's Homepage

The Review — Games and Glory Edition

17 min read

The Review — Games and Glory Edition

The Integrity Arms Race · Feb. 25, 2026 · Vol. I, No. 1

Every Game Has Two Scoreboards

Edition Thesis

In each case, someone found a gap between what the rules measure and what actually matters — and walked right through it. The tools for corrupting competition and the tools for detecting corruption are advancing in lockstep, and neither side is winning cleanly.

Dear reader, something strange is happening in sports, and it isn’t any one scandal.

In January, federal prosecutors in Philadelphia unsealed an indictment that read like a crime novel: 26 people, 17 college basketball teams, fixers who recruited players from the Chinese Basketball Association before moving into NCAA locker rooms, bribes of 30,000 a game — life-changing money if you play for Nicholls State and your Name-Image-Likeness deal pays nothing. One of the fixers texted a co-conspirator: “The only things certain in life are death, taxes and Chinese basketball.”

That same month, at the Winter Olympics in Milan, the most technically gifted figure skater alive opened his free skate, approached the quadruple axel that only he has ever landed in competition, and bailed into a single rotation. Then the rest of the program collapsed. The scoring system recorded 72 points of deductions and had nothing to say about why.

Two days earlier, a French judge had scored her own country’s ice dancers nearly eight points above the Americans in the same event. Five of nine judges preferred the American team. One outlier score flipped the gold medal.

Meanwhile, a Swedish nutrition company solved a problem that has plagued endurance athletes for decades: how to take enough sodium bicarbonate to delay fatigue without, to put it delicately, rendering yourself unable to finish the race. Their solution — wrapping the compound in a pH-sensitive hydrogel — is legal, effective and raises a question nobody in sports governance has bothered to answer: When an athlete can chemically silence the body’s acid alarm system, what exactly is a race measuring?

In chess, the detection tools designed to catch cheaters were turned against an honest player, and a 29-year-old grandmaster died. In courtrooms from Baltimore to Boston, the lawyer who broke Big Tobacco is running the same playbook against DraftKings.

Five stories. One pattern. This is The Review’s Games and Glory edition. We call it the Integrity Arms Race.

Part I — The Exploiters

Death, Taxes and Chinese Basketball

The biggest college point-shaving scandal in decades started with a text message and a plane ticket to Baton Rouge.

Twenty-six people woke up on Jan. 15, 2026, to federal agents at their doors. By lunchtime, U.S. Attorney David Metcalf stood at a podium in Philadelphia and described what prosecutors called “an extensive international criminal conspiracy” that had poisoned college basketball for two and a half years.

The numbers alone are staggering: 17 NCAA Division I men’s basketball programs. Thirty-nine players. Twenty-nine games fixed or attempted. A conspiracy that ran from September 2022 to February 2025 before a single arrest.

The fixers — Shane Hennen, Marves Fairley and others, including former NBA player Antonio Blakeney — started overseas. They first corrupted players in the Chinese Basketball Association, then used those players and their alumni networks to gain access to NCAA locker rooms. They weren’t looking for stars. They were looking for athletes nobody was paying.

Their targets were schools where Name-Image-Likeness compensation was functionally zero: Nicholls State, Coppin State, Northwestern State, Kennesaw State. The fixers offered 30,000 per game. The highest documented payment was $40,000 to a Kennesaw State player named Simeon Cottle — more than many of these athletes’ families earn in a year.

The scheme centered on “prop bets,” wagers on specific player statistics rather than final scores. A player doesn’t have to lose the game. They just have to fall short of a statistical target — score fewer than 15 points, grab fewer than seven rebounds. The manipulation stays invisible to teammates, coaches, even most fans.

“We allege an extensive international criminal conspiracy of NCAA players, alumni and professional bettors who fixed games across the country and poisoned the American spirit of competition for monetary gain.” — David Metcalf, U.S. Attorney, EDPA, Jan. 15, 2026. Source: DOJ

Defenders of the system note that point-shaving at small programs has existed for decades and that the indictments prove law enforcement works. But that defense confuses catching crooks with deterring them. The conspiracy ran for 30 months. The fixers specifically targeted programs where oversight was thinnest and athletes were poorest.

The NIL era was supposed to give college athletes legitimate income. At schools where that money never arrives, it created a two-tier system in which the bribe is the only offer on the table.

“The only things certain in life are death, taxes and Chinese basketball.” — Shane Hennen, text message entered as evidence in federal indictment. Source: ESPN / DOJ

The wager amounts tell the story as clearly as any quote: 458,000 on Towson to beat North Carolina A&T. 424,000 on Kent State to cover a first-half spread against Buffalo. Massive sums on afterthought games. The second scoreboard was wide open, and for two and a half years, nobody in charge was reading it.

Further Reading:

  • PRO: “Balancing Innovation and Risk: The Case of Legalized Sports Betting” — Michael Mandel, Progressive Policy Institute (link, September 2025)
  • CON: “Beyond the Court: NCAA Infractions Turn into Federal Indictments” — Darden & Kolansky, Jackson Lewis P.C. (link, January 2026)

The Pill That Silences the Pain Alarm

A Swedish nutrition company solved sodium bicarbonate’s stomach problem. Now the question is whether a race still measures what we think it does.

For decades, endurance athletes have known a secret that sounded too good — and too disgusting — to be true. Sodium bicarbonate, common baking soda, delays the burn of high-intensity effort by neutralizing the acid that builds in working muscles. The science was never the problem. The stomach was.

Effective doses reliably caused vomiting, diarrhea and gastrointestinal distress severe enough to cancel out any performance benefit. Athletes called it the “bicarbonate ceiling.” The Maurten Bicarb System cracked the problem, encapsulating sodium bicarbonate in a pH-sensitive hydrogel matrix that passes through the stomach intact and is absorbed in the intestine.

A peer-reviewed study from Edge Hill University found that the hydrogel system reduced gastrointestinal discomfort by 79 arbitrary units compared to traditional capsules while maintaining the same boost in extracellular buffering capacity.

“I figured if everybody else is using it… And it’s been working wonders.” — Marco Arop, Canadian 800m gold medalist, Paris Olympics, August 2024. Source: NBC News

The World Anti-Doping Agency does not prohibit it. The IOC’s own 2018 consensus statement recommended it. Nothing about this is illegal.

The question the Maurten system raises is not whether it constitutes cheating — it doesn’t. The question is what a race is actually measuring. The acid buildup that bicarbonate neutralizes is not a design flaw in human physiology. It is a safety system. When an athlete can chemically silence that alarm, is the event still a test of human endurance? Or has it become a competition of pharmaceutical engineering operating within the rules?

“I would classify that as small but meaningful.” — Eli Spencer Shannon, researcher, quoted by NBC News, March 2025.

Further Reading:

  • PRO: “Should You Be Using Sodium Bicarb for Training and Racing?” — Precision Fuel & Hydration (link, July 2025)
  • CON: “Explainer: Why Athletes Are Taking Sodium Bicarbonate Supplements” — Chemistry World (link, September 2024)

Part II — The Detectors

The Witch Hunt That Worked — Until It Didn’t

Open-source tools can catch a chess cheater in minutes. They can also destroy an honest player. The institution for telling the difference doesn’t exist yet.

The story begins with a former world champion and a spreadsheet. In October 2024, Vladimir Kramnik — one of the greatest chess players in history, the man who dethroned Garry Kasparov in 2000 — began posting statistical analyses on social media. His targets were younger players whose online results he considered suspiciously consistent with computer engine evaluations.

The tools to do this are freely available. Anyone with a laptop can download Stockfish or Leela Chess Zero, feed in a player’s games and produce a statistical profile in minutes. FIDE stripped Kirill Shevchenko of his Grandmaster title and banned him until October 2026 after confirming he used a mobile phone during a tournament. Shevchenko proved the system can work.

But Kramnik wasn’t targeting confirmed cheaters. He was targeting players whose results he found implausible — including Daniel Naroditsky, a 29-year-old American Grandmaster, beloved chess streamer and educational content creator.

“Ever since the Kramnik stuff, I feel like if I start doing well, people assume the worst of intentions. The issue is just the lingering effect of it.” — Daniel Naroditsky, Twitch stream, October 2025.

On Oct. 20, 2025, Naroditsky was found dead at his home in Charlotte, N.C. He was 29. A recent medical report attributed his death to a cardiac issue. His family filed a harassment complaint with FIDE’s Ethics Commission on Nov. 12.

“That is all I have. If I knew that some of the most influential movers and shakers of the chess world would carry the notion that I am a completely morally bankrupt individual, that would represent the complete failure of literally everything… my reason for waking up in the morning.” — Daniel Naroditsky, final stream, October 2025.

The chess cheating problem is real. But the distinction between institutional detection and crowd-sourced accusation is the story’s backbone. When FIDE investigates and bans Shevchenko, that is a process with evidence, appeal and consequence. When a former world champion publishes a statistical dossier and a streamer reads it to 50,000 viewers, that is a trial with no jury, no defense and no acquittal.

The tools for detection are powerful. The institution for wielding them responsibly does not yet exist.

Further Reading:

  • PRO: “Chess Body Investigates Vladimir Kramnik” — NPR (link, October 2025)
  • CON: “Gukesh Says Fears About Cheating in Chess Are Overblown” — The Federal (link, February 2026)

The Eight-Point Judge and the Frozen Champion

At the same Olympics, one judge gamed the scoring system with national bias. One skater’s mind refused to let his body do what it had done a thousand times. The algorithm that governs figure skating could explain neither.

Ilia Malinin was supposed to win. He is the only person alive who can land a quadruple axel. On Feb. 13, 2026, at the Milano Ice Skating Arena, Malinin opened his Olympic free skate with a gorgeous quadruple flip. Then he approached the axel — the jump that defines him — and bailed into a single rotation. What followed was a collapse that no one in the arena could explain.

SkaterNationShortFreeTotalRank
Mikhail ShaidorovKAZ92.94198.64291.581
Yuma KagiyamaJPN103.01177.05280.062
Shun SatoJPN98.42176.48274.903
Ilia MalininUSA108.16156.33264.498

“I blew it. That’s honestly the first thing that came into my mind — there’s no way that just happened.” — Ilia Malinin, NBC post-skate interview, Feb. 13, 2026. Source

Two days before Malinin’s collapse, French judge Jézabel Dabouis scored French ice dancers nearly eight points above Americans Madison Chock and Evan Bates — a 7.71-point spread. Dabouis’s score (137.45) was the only mark above 130 given to any of the 20 competitors. Five of nine judges preferred the Americans. Dabouis’s outlier score flipped the gold medal.

Sportico published the quantitative analysis: 30 of 36 short-program judges scored their own country’s skaters higher, averaging 1.93 points of home-country bias. In the free skate, 25 of 29 judges did the same, averaging 3.34 points. The ISU’s International Judging System was designed after the 2002 Salt Lake City scandal to prevent exactly this kind of manipulation. Twenty-four years later, the same corruption runs through a more sophisticated machine.

“I think it would definitely be helpful if it’s more understandable for the viewers to just see more transparent judging.” — Madison Chock, CBS News interview, February 2026.

Further Reading:

  • PRO: “Olympic Figure Skating Has a Judging Problem. The Data Shows It” — Sportico (link, February 2026)
  • CON: “The Human Factor: Inside Bias in Olympic Judging” — Broken Ice (link, February 2026)

Part III — The Reckoning

The Tobacco Lawyer’s Last Crusade

The man who broke Big Tobacco is running the same playbook against DraftKings. The sportsbooks know it’s coming. They can’t stop it.

Richard Daynard is 81 years old. He is a University Distinguished Professor of Law at Northeastern University, president of the Public Health Advocacy Institute and the architect of the litigation strategy that broke the tobacco industry in the 1990s. If you have ever seen a surgeon general’s warning on a cigarette pack, you have seen his work product.

In December 2023, Daynard filed a lawsuit against DraftKings in Massachusetts. In August 2024, a Massachusetts Superior Court judge denied DraftKings’ motion for summary judgment. The case is proceeding.

“Online gambling is creating a public health disaster with increasingly addictive products right before our eyes. The massive advertising bears an uncanny similarity to what the cigarette companies used to get away with.” — Richard Daynard, PHAI statement, December 2023. Source: Boston Globe

On April 3, 2025, Baltimore became the first American city to sue DraftKings and FanDuel directly. The timeline since then reads like a litigation drumroll: class action in Pennsylvania (July 2025), Massachusetts 871 million in Super Bowl wagers on a single day.

A 2024 Wall Street Journal review found that at one major U.S. sportsbook, 0.5 percent of the customer base generated more than 70 percent of revenue. Harvard’s Malcolm Sparrow warned that “we suspect up to 50 percent of gamblers suffer some degree of harm and regret.”

“We’re talking about litigation changing the discussion. And once you talk about something — in tobacco cases and sports-betting — the tobacco companies had nothing to say for themselves.” — Richard Daynard, interview, April 2025. Source: Deseret News

He has drafted the SAFE Bet Act with Rep. Paul Tonko (D-N.Y.). The strategy mirrors the tobacco playbook in every particular: litigation to change the discussion, legislation to change the rules, public health framing to change the culture.

The counterargument that increased reporting explains the helpline data does not survive the suicidal ideation numbers. Callers reporting suicidal thoughts have more than doubled since 2022. That is not a reporting artifact. And the state is simultaneously the regulator, the tax collector and the marketing partner. Asking a state to regulate the product from which it profits is asking R.J. Reynolds to write the surgeon general’s warning.

Daynard already won that argument once.

Further Reading:

Editorial: Reading the Second Scoreboard

The Pattern

Someone found a gap between what the rules measure and what actually matters — and exploited it. The measurement systems will always be one step behind the exploitation, because the people doing the exploiting are responding to the measurements.

The five stories in this edition share a structure that none of them can see on their own. Pull back far enough, and the pattern is unmistakable.

A federal prosecutor in Philadelphia maps a bribery network running from the Chinese Basketball Association to the Southland Conference. A nutrition scientist in Sweden wraps baking soda in a polymer shell that defeats the human stomach. An 81-year-old law professor in Boston files a lawsuit against DraftKings using the same brief template he used against Philip Morris. A French judge in Milan scores her countrymen eight points higher than the math allows. A 29-year-old chess streamer goes silent after a statistical model is wielded as a weapon against his reputation.

Each story has its own characters, its own timeline, its own institutional failure. But the mechanism underneath is the same in every case: someone found a gap between what the rules measure and what actually matters — and exploited it.

Each escalation produces the next. The more money that flows through legal sportsbooks, the more attractive match-fixing becomes. The more sophisticated the detection tools, the more easily they can be turned against honest targets. The more athletes rely on legal supplements, the harder it becomes to define what a “natural” performance is. The more data-driven the scoring systems, the more precisely we can measure the outcomes without understanding the causes.

This is not a fight between cheaters and enforcers. It is a fight between measurement systems and the reality they fail to capture.

The honest answer — the one nobody running these institutions wants to give — is that integrity is not a problem you solve. It is a race you run.

If there is cause for something resembling optimism, it is this: the gaps are becoming visible faster. Sportico’s judging analysis was published one week after the ice dance final. The DOJ’s college basketball indictment drew on digital evidence that the fixers themselves created. The Maurten Bicarb System’s effects are being studied in real time by independent researchers. The chess community’s response to the Kramnik-Naroditsky tragedy has produced concrete institutional reforms at FIDE. Daynard’s litigation strategy is being studied and replicated by cities and states before the first case has even gone to trial.

The second scoreboard never stops running. The question, as always, is whether anyone in charge is reading it — and whether they’ll act on what it says before the next escalation makes their current rules obsolete.

The answer, if history is any guide, is: barely, and usually too late. But the gaps between failures are getting shorter, and the documentation is getting better. That may be the most we can ask.

Further Reading:

  • PRO: “Sports Betting Worries Grow as Wagers Skyrocket” — Harvard Gazette (link, January 2026)
  • CON: “The Rise of Sports Betting Is a Growing Public Health Crisis” — Isaac Rose-Berman, STAT News (link, November 2025)

The Review is an experimental daily newspaper for working researchers. Games and Glory is our sports integrity edition. All facts have been verified against primary sources. Quotes are attributed with source links. Opinions in the editorial section are those of The Review.

Edition: Games and Glory — The Integrity Arms Race Date: Feb. 25, 2026 Author: Daniel Markham

Graph View