2026-02-09 - Consolidate Research
Goal
Today’s task is much more semantic and concept re-imagining. Not much search should be required. I’m interested in the quality and cohesiveness of the intellectual discourse I’ve uncovered.
I’ve requested several research reports along the same theme. They are included below. I want you to take all of them and figure the best, most interesting and new to readers. Then rearrange the supporting stories around that theme. Please keep the links to research more when they’re appropriate. You may join stories, split stories, even delete stories that are not relevant or overlap others. PLEASE DO NOT ELIMINATE ANY INFORMATION, although you can delete redundancies and clean up text and make tighter. I prefer a “re-imagining” approach over simple analytics or fact-checking, since the assumption is that each of these reports is already fact-checked. All I want as an answer is one new research report that has the best of the lot. Create whatever structure you’d like for that. Some of these research structures are quite good. Don’t give me any other text besides your report, and don’t repeat any of my instructions in the result. Most of these titles suck and are overly academic so try to find a new title for your research report that is more readable and accessible to the lay reader. I want some kind of nice picture for each of these — infographic, chart, media release, etc.
If the number of themes varies by report, the fewest number of themes always wins. That means that one of the report generators took the time to consolidate overlapping ideas.
I would like enough material to create a book-length work if necessary, but for now I’m simply interested in whether or not it can all be melded together perhaps to make a long form magazine around, like the New Yorker. I need the conceptual joining together first, take some time to look at that, then decide how much meat is there and where we’re headed
It is output from several LLMs.
I am a critical examiner. I’m much more interested in watching very smart people discuss very important issues than I am an advocate of any position or another. This is a meaty subject and I know it’s a tough ask.
The end product should be enough to read over a couple of hours or so. Right now I’m more interested in seeing how well you can combine various deep intellectual themes. Pick whatever format is easiest for you. Markdown is fine
Success Criteria
Each of these sections looks interesting and it’s going to be tough for me to figure out what to keep or not.
If you’re capable of it, you’re going to need an orchestration document that you can check off and you’ll need to do this in very small pieces and then assemble. It’s too much to do at one time.
Failure Indicators
Whatever you do, if there’s not much text for each topic you’re cutting too much, too early.
Any sort of topic repetition or overlap.
Deletion of any related resources. If I continue developing this, I’m going to need whatever supporting material I started off with.